Federal Agents

Guest · Federal Agents

1. JURISDICTIONAL AUTHORITY

According to N.H. R.S.A. Ch. 123:1 http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/IX/123/123-1.htm BEFORE the Feds can operate withIN this state IN-cluding this City of Lebanon as a subset of the set, they must comply with the law: Art. I, Sec. 8, Cl. 17 of the U.S. Constitution that requires that they first obtain "Consent" of the State Legislature.

2. CERTIFICATION OF NON-COMPLIANCE

In early January '07 I read of the I.R.S. v. Ed & Elaine Brown trial in Concord of him citing this statute and so I read it, and decided to check it out myself. Guess what? He's right! For $10.00 I did obtain a certified copy of non-compliance from the Deputy Secretary of State who did seal his statement on Jan. 7, 2007 that there was no "oath of some officer of the United States" filed with the secretary of this state".

3. BLOCKAGE OF EVIDENCE INTO THE CASE.

During the Brown trial I gave a copy of this evidence to the U.S. Attorney's Office. Then the following day DURING trial too, I returned to get a day/time stamped version as proof, and the receptionist told me that it was given over to Assistant U.S. Attorney Bill Morse, the prosecutor in this case who was downstairs in courtroom #5. I attended ALL of the trial FROM then to the end, and at no such time did the prosecutor give this evidence to be marked over for an exhibit to the judge to give to the jury as exculpatory evidence to back up what Ed has verbally said during the trial. The Prosecutor is guilty of having violated Federal Rule 16, and State Rule 3.8 for evidence, but that "they"/ the powers-that-be at the federal level REFUSE to rule: YES or NO, merely do-nothings sitting on the fence. My complaint for such falling on deaf ears, with NO reply from the Feds! even after I've taken them to the PCC: State Professional Conduct Committee, awaiting a hearing on: May __ '07 @ __:__ am/pm?

4. CHECK-AND-BALANCE, or "CHICKEN-BALLAST" ( Wink

Another photocopy of this certificate was given to the Governor & Council by me, in person at their Wed., May 2nd G&C meeting during the Public Hearing phase for the Executive Councilors to please advise or "counsel" the governor to assert his Art. 41+51 powers of enforcing all legislative mandates as by the "shall" word as a must or mandatory requirement. In this case, for "Jurisdiction" to be there there "shall be filed" this oath with the documents of the "description and plan of the land". Result: The Councilors have not done their advising, and ought to be impeached for corruption in office, as by Article 63 in the N.H. Constitution. The word corrupt defined as perverted, and so an element in the Art. 10 right of revolution when they debase or lower in value the state to that of UNDER the federal gov't, or in other words putting the creature ABOVE that of the creator. We formed the Union, and stipulated what must occur BEFORE they can enter this state, and by their operating papers not there, and this Executive branch in cahoots, leaves what other ends of gov't to check out before the revolution starts? The other branches of gov't being the Legislative and Judicial? As I've said: I've gone to the Supreme Court's PCC with nothing yet, and the House State-Federal Relations Committee in the General Court/ Legislature too with my Article 32 Petition as REFUSED to be House Rule 36 endorsed for House Rule 4 action, but why!? There was no answer. Thus to go down this executive road to the County and the City. I've been to the County Commissioners (see last month's Minutes of Meeting on this where they REFUSED to urge the governor to do his job), thus:

5. PLEASE PUT ME ON THE WED., JUNE 6 '07 @ 6 PM AGENDA

I'd like to tell you of how a Sheriff out west has his written policy of the Feds to show their chain-of-command BEFORE they enter his county (papers on file with Sullivan County Sheriff Michael Prozzo), and of my latest PETITION FOR MANDAMUS just filed yesterday: Fri., May 18th under Title 28 U.S. Code Sec. 1361 of an "Action to compel an officer of the United States to perform his duty." See http://www.defraudingamerica.com/crime_reporting_statute_right.html The County having some crime commission that reports to the Commissioners and the head man was there last month when I talked about this, but got up from his chair and walked out so as to be like that deaf/blind no-speak monkey playing the 'ol "Hogan's Heroes" Shultz routine of: I see nothing! like on that 1960s TV series. Will I encounter similar no see-ums at the local level?

Yours truly, - - - - - - - - - - Joe / Joseph S. Haas, P.O. Box 3842, Concord, N.H. 03302, Tel. 603: 848-6059 (cell phone).

P.S. I know what some of you are thinking: the end justifies the means. You're saying that because the Browns did not pay the tax bill sent to them by the Feds then they deserve no protection, but that is wrong! They have paid their property taxes in both your city and over there in Plainfield (plus the county) and are owed protection from you all by Article 12 of the N.H. Const. & Bill of Rights, not mere privileges but rights! The right to both: (1) procedural, and; (2) substantive due process of law!! In fact, from the forum here at http://newhampshireunderground.com/forum/index.php?topic=3868.3285 I've learned in addition to the law + facts in the IRS case #M.83-50-D that I won back in 1983 @ Concord, N.H. The letter D for then Chief Judge Shane Devine, involving the OMB#, etc. that there's an EO, or Executive Order from the President to the Secretary of the Treasury for his T.O.: Treasury Order, but because the TO is "not" published in the CFR: Code of Federal Regulations, it does NOT apply to us in the public-at-large, but ONLY to federal employees. Check out: http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2007/05/doj_and_distric.html and my reply to there of yesterday that: "Not only is the Code 'far more limited' but just look at the words: 'to lay and collect' in the 16th Amendment itself: to lay is apply or impose, or in other words: to impose as to levy, or to apply as in to make a request, as for when the IRS officer asks you to donate, you take the Nancy Reagan slogan of: Just Say No! ( Wink

because to levy is to collect, so to collect and collect? That is redundancy as against our rights from duplicity orders guaranteed by the Ninth Amendment."

Guest

Don't you love when the people in power seem to think no one pays much attention or just plain don't care about these things!? Well most sadly do not anymore and this country is not what it once was and sadly the wealthy and the power hungry run our lives now due to it, but that is to happen with any government so should have seen that coming!

Though I do agree with the aforementioned article I also do not see much to come of it.